window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'UA-16803030-1');

July TBL Lunch & Learn – Business Video: Not Just for Teleconferencing

Join us for lunch to learn more about how business video is no longer just for teleconferencing, but becoming an integral part of day-to-day operations. In fact, your employees are already using it!  TBL’s Patrick Tredway will lead the discussion and allow you the chance to ask questions.  PLUS, NO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION!

Click here to attend our July Lunch & Learn

Dates/Locations:

Virginia Beach, VA – July 20th – Ruth’s Chris
Richmond, VA – July 21st– Hondo’s

Topics:

  • What is video going to do to my network?
  • Why video has historically NOT been successful.
  • Examples of how companies are embracing video.
  • How video can provide your company a competitive advantage.

Who should attend:
Anyone interested in business video and how it affects your IT infrastructure. 

Save your spot! Register now!

About Patrick:

Patrick Tredway is TBL’s Collaboration Practice Lead and Account Engineer. He is a CCIE Voice certified engineer and has been working with Cisco Unified Communications since 2002. In addition, Patrick is a co-owner of TBL Networks and a fully licensed pilot .

About TBL Networks:

TBL Networks, 2010 Cisco Collaboration Partner of the Year and certified VMware Enterprise Solutions Provider partner, provides our customers a wide range of advanced technology solutions, with a focus on Unified Communications, Virtualization and Storage.

A Structured Virtual Infrastructure Approach Part III: Compute Platform Software

In Part II of the Structured Virtual Infrastructure Approach Series, we explored the Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) hardware. This post will explore the UCS management software. Up to 20 chassis can be managed with a single instance of the UCS Manager. The UCS Manager is included with the 6100 series fabric interconnects. All of the blades in the infrastructure can be managed through this single interface. Below, we’ll discuss some of the features that make this interface unique among compute platform management interfaces.

Complete Compute Infrastructure Management

  • All the chassis / blades (up to 20 chassis worth) are managed in this single interface.
  • The management is not “per chassis” like legacy blade systems.
  • Consolidated management means efficient management for the entire compute platform.

Service Profiles

  • All of the items that make a single server (blade) unique are abstracted with a service profile.
  • This may include WWN, MAC, Bios Settings, Boot Order, Firmware Revisions, etc.
  • WWN’s and MAC’s are pulled from a pool that can be defined.
  • Even the KVM management IP’s are pulled from a pool so the administrator does not have to manage those IP’s at all.
  • You can create a Service Profile template with all of these characteristics and create Service Profiles from the template.
  • When you need to deploy a new blade all of the unique adjustments are already completed from the Service Profile template.
  • With the M81KR Virtual Interface Card (VIC) the number of interfaces assigned to a blade can be defined in the Service Profile template.
  • Even though the a single mezzanine card in a blade will only have (2) 10Gb ports, the M81KR VIC allows you to define up to 56 FC/Ethernet ports. This allows for more familiar vSphere Networking setups like the one below:

image

The diagram above is a setup that can be used with the Cisco Nexus 1000v. It would be impossible to do this setup on the UCS B-Series without the M81KR VIC. We’ll explore why a networking setup like this may be necessary when we get to the vSphere specific posts in this series.

Role Based Access Control

  • Even though the components are converging (storage, compute, networking) the different teams responsible for those components can still maintain access control for their particular area of responsibility.
  • The UCS manager has permissions that can be applied in such a way that each team only has access to the administrative tab(s) that they are responsible for.
  • Network team –> Network Tab, Server Team –> Server Tab, Storage Team –> Storage Tab.
  • The UCS manager also supports several different authentication methods, including local and LDAP based authentication.

What vSphere does for the Operating System instances, the UCS does for the blade hardware. It abstracts the unique configuration items into a higher software layer so that they can be easier managed from a single location.  The next post in this series will take a look at some storage platform hardware. It’s not just about carving out disks for the virtual infrastructure any longer. We’ll take a look at some options that integrate well with a modern vSphere infrastructure.

A Cius User, Part I

Cisco’s much anticipated business tablet, the Cius, has been orderable for a month or so now. As any diligent technology evangelist would do, I made sure we submitted an order right away. A pair will be for customer demonstrations in the TBL office, of course, but I was also excited about the idea of being the trial user for the tablet at TBL Networks. I am a pretty mobile user, with several different use cases that would put the Cius to the test – and I wouldn’t feel right about making anyone else at TBL the guinea pig other than myself. What better way to chronicle the adoption of such a revolutionary new device than to keep a regular diary of my use of it on the blog.

So, Part I: The Wait. As with any new piece of technology, supply and demand kicks in and I anxiously await the delivery of the Cius tablets. So while we wait, let’s review the stats. It’s got a 7” diagonal, high-resolution color screen with contact-based touch targets delivering an elegant, intuitive user experience, HD video (720p) with Cisco TelePresence solution interoperability for life-like video communication with the simplicity of a phone call, HD audio with wideband support, and Wi-Fi (802.11a/b/g/n) support with Bluetooth 3.0 to help employees stay connected and mobile. Loaded it with software to make it most effective, the Cius runs the Android operating system, with access Android marketplace applications, and has virtual desktop clients to enable highly secure access to cloud-based business applications, collaboration applications including Cisco Quad, Presence, IM and integrated, one-click access to WebEx Meeting Center, and of course, HD video as a Cisco TelePresence endpoint. With a detachable and serviceable 8-hour battery for a full day of work and a HD media station dock that supports Bluetooth and USB peripherals, 10/100/1000 wired connectivity, a monitor, mouse and keyboard, and a telephone handset, the Cius is the ultimate device for the user at their desk or on the road.

I look forward to reporting more on how the Cius effects my life.

Cisco Expands UC Virtualization Support

Stand back….this is a pretty big announcement!  As of June 7, 2011 Cisco began support for some Collaboration (formerly Unified Communications) applications running in a virtual environment on hardware other than their own Unified Computing System (UCS). The is the first in hopefully many steps to come in widening support for benefits we often realize with typical desktop and server applications running on a VMware hypervisor. The details are as follows.

 

Cisco is pleased to announce expanded virtualization of Cisco Unified Communications starting Jun 7, 2011.

On Jun 7 Cisco will add two additional virtualized UC offers. Customers will then have three deployment options:

1. UC on UCS – Tested Reference Configurations

2. UC on UCS – Specs-based VMware hardware support

3. HP and IBM – Specs-based VMware hardware support

Phase 1 support begins Jun 7, 2011 and should include the following (see www.cisco.com/go/uc-virtualized for final products and versions supported):

– Cisco Unified Communications Manager 8.0.2+ and 8.5.1

– Cisco Unified Communications Manager – Session Management Edition 8.5.1

– Cisco Unified Communications Management Suite

– Cisco Unity Connection 8.0.2+ and 8.5.1

– Cisco Unity 7.0.2+ (with Fiber Channel SAN only)

– Cisco Unified Contact Center Express and IP IVR 8.5.1

Support for additional products and versions will phase in over rest of CY11.

Specs-based VMware hardware support adds the following

– UC Compute support for UCS, HP, IBM servers on VMware’s hardware compatibility list and running Intel Xeon 5600 / 7500 family CPUs

– UC Network support for 1Gb through 10Gb NIC, CNA, HBA and Cisco VIC adapters that are supported by above servers

– UC Storage support for DAS, SAN (Fiber Channel, iSCSI, FCoE) and NAS (NFS).

– More co-resident UC VMs per physical server if more powerful CPUs are used

– Note that UC / non-UC / 3rd-party co-residency is still not supported.

– Note that hardware oversubscription is still not supported by UC.

– No changes to VMware product, version or feature support by UC

 

This most certainly gives us far more agility for the manner in which we deploy these applications. More info to come as I get it…

Windows 7 Migration and VDI – TBL’s June Lunch and Learn Summary

Harley Stagner led off TBL’s Lunch and Learn series with a discussion on virtual desktop infrastructure and how it relates to Windows 7 migration.  As TBL Networks’ lead virtualization engineer (and only VCDX in Virginia)  Harley arrived at the events in Richmond and Virginia Beach armed with a whiteboard, laptop and the promise (which he kept) of no PowerPoint!

Harley began by reviewing the three distinct components of the desktop – the OS, applications and user data.  From there, he discussed how operational efficiencies can be gained by separating these individual components in a virtual desktop environment.  Finally, Harley provided a live demo of entitling VMware ThinApp packages to a desktop pool using VMware View 4.6.

JuneLunchI

JuneLunchII

 

Thank you to everyone in Richmond and Hampton Roads who came out for our June discussion.  We had a lot of great audience participation and some very insightful questions.  Our July Lunch & Learn topic is “Business Video – Not Just For Teleconferencing,” and the discussion will be led by TBL’s Patrick Tredway.  To learn more and to reserve your spot for either the Richmond or Hampton Roads date, please go to TBL’s Eventbrite site at  http://tblnetworks.eventbrite.com/.

A Structured Virtual Infrastructure Part II: Compute Platform Hardware

In Part I of this series, I discussed some design options for a virtual infrastructure (Traditional Rackmount, Converged Rackmount, and Converged Blade). Using the Converged Blade option as the model going forward, we’ll explore the individual components of this solution in more detail. This post will explore the Compute Platform (UCS B-Series) in more detail.

 

image

Let’s start with the “brains” of the UCS B-Series, the 6100 series fabric interconnects.

6100 Series Fabric Interconnects:

Interconnect / Module Options:

  • 6120XP – (20) 10gbE and FCoE capable SFP+ port Fabric Interconnect with a single expansion module slot
  • 6140XP – (40) 10gbE and FCoE capable SFP+ port Fabric Interconnect with two expansion module slots

Expansion Module Options:

  • 10Gbps SFP+ – (6) ports
  • 10Gbps SFP+ – (4) ports, 1/2/4 Gbps Native Fibre Channel SFP+ – (4) ports
  • 1/2/4 Gbps Native Fibre Channel SFP+ – (8) ports
  • 2/4/8 Gbps Native Fibre Channel SFP+ – (6) ports

Below is a diagram of the UCS 6120XP labeled with the different ports:

image

A redundant UCS system consists of two 6100 series devices. They are connected via the cluster ports to act in unison. If a port or the whole 6100 series were to fail, the other would take over.

The 6100 series fabric interconnects provide 10Gb connectivity to the UCS 5108 via a module called the 2104XP fabric extender. A single pair of 6100 series fabric interconnects can manage up to twenty chassis depending on your bandwidth needs per chassis.

5108 Chassis (8 blade slots per chassis):

image

As you can see from the diagram you have two 2104XP Fabric Extenders per chassis. Each of the 2104XP’s have four 10Gb ports for a total of up to 80Gbps of throughput for the chassis. So, there is plenty of bandwidth and the added benefit of fewer cables and consequently, easier cable management. The only cables that will ever be needed for the back of the 5108 chassis are up to eight cables for connectivity and up to 4 cables for power.

Since the bandwidth needed for the external network is calculated at the Fabric Interconnect level, all that is needed at that point is to calculate the computing needs for the workload (CPU and RAM). This is where the blades themselves come in.

Blade Options:

  • Full-Width Blades (B250 M1, B440 M1) take up two chassis slots each
  • Half-Width Blades (B200 M2, B230 M1) take up one chassis slot each
  • You can have a combination of blades in the same chassis up to eight chassis slots
  • The blade processor configurations range.
  • The B2xx blades have either 4, 6, or 8 core processors in a dual socket configuration
  • The B440 M1 can hold up to (4) sockets of the Intel 7500 series 8 core processors
  • The B250 M1 holds up to 384GB of RAM in a full-width form factor
  • The B200 M2 holds up to 96GB of RAM in a half-width form factor
  • The B230 M1 holds up to 256GB of RAM in a half-width form factor
  • The full-width servers can hold up to (2) mezzanine cards for connectivity. Each card has (2) 10Gb ports for connectivity. That’s 20Gbps per card.

M81KR Virtual Interface Card:

The M81KR Virtual Interface Card deserves a special mention. This mezzanine card is capable of dividing the (2) 10Gbps ports into a combination of up to 56 virtual Ethernet and Fibre channel ports. This way you can manage port isolation and QoS for your blades like you may be used to in a traditional rackmount virtual infrastructure. As these posts continue, we will explore why this functionality may be needed for the virtual infrastructure when using the Converged Blade Infrastructure Model.

This post explored some of the Compute Platform Hardware components. The next post in this series will explore some of the software components and management that make the UCS compute platform ideal for a structured virtual infrastructure that can scale incrementally and be managed easily.

No Need to Gamble

It’s no great secret that server virtualization can save a company money. The statement, while the topic of many a blog post 5 years ago as a theorem, is accepted as a law today. This industry “given” has created a great deal of complacency in IT directors and financial officers alike. The simple concept of serving the same user base with the same level of computing using less physical hardware almost proves lower cost just in the statement alone, right?  Only if you believe that the only change in costs between the two scenarios (non-virtualized vs. virtualized) is in the cost of the hardware… and even then, aren’t you investing in more hardware for lager, higher-capacity servers at the very beginning of the virtualization project? Surely, as with any major change in technology, other devices, systems, processes, and administration are affected. This would surely suggest that the costs of these areas are affected as well.

Computer Associated performed a study of 800 organizations who had undergone a virtualization project. 44% of respondents who said they had deployed server virtualization were unable to declare their deployment a success. A key factor in their reluctance to claim positive results was their inability to quantify the ROI. These were companies who believe the theorem as a law, and trudged ahead believing cost savings would just materialize as soon as they started consolidating servers. Poorly planned virtualization projects with repeated surprises and adjustments, along with poorly executed virtualization plans can make any IT organization feel like they may not be getting the promised results from their investment.

With any scientific endeavor, the quantifying of investment savings being no different, a clear baseline measurement to measure against is a necessity. How can you say how much was saved if you can’t accurately compare it to how much you were spending before. And as discussed above, this has to include more than just the cost of server hardware. Additionally, a clear plan of consolidation by someone experienced in virtualization practices will provide the best opportunity to capture all the savings virtualization has to offer. A project that only implements part of the features of virtualization will only recognize a portion of the cost savings. Will that be enough to tip the scales to a positive ROI?

Don’t gamble with your IT budget and hope that virtualization it a sure bet. Ask us how TBL can perform a Virtualization Financial Impact Analysis on your server infrastructure and provide a plan for a project that delivers the technology and the cost savings.

WebEx: Any Place, Any Device

It’s no secret that WebEx clients have existed on the iOS and Andriod platforms for quite some time. Having said that, the release of the iPad2 and the latest WebEx Meeting Center release…things have gotten pretty cool! At last, the usability of the tablet device in a WebEx session feels comparable to sitting at a desktop. From the high quality view of shared content, native VoIP integration for the audio call path, the tight integration with the built in cameras, there’s not a whole lot you will find missing.

 

With the Cisco Cius just becoming orderable at the end of May 2011, we eagerly awaiting our new tablets to see how they compare. Even Cameron seems excited…see below!

 

photo

 

photo